Absolute Music and Ideal Content: Autonomy, Sensation and Experience in Arthur Symons’ “Theory of Musical Aesthetics"

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

I seek not only to discern the content of Arthur Symons’s “musical aesthetics,” such as it is, and to situate it within contemporaneous musical discussions, but also to show how his perspective provides a crucial illumination of the interaction between literary and musical models of autonomy at the turn of the twentieth century. Symons can certainly be seen as distinctive in his facilitation of this interaction because he was the only aesthetic critic to engage directly with the musical repertory, as opposed to an abstracted concept of music—or, following Pater, the “condition” thereof. But further, I will argue that Symons’s transplantation into a musical context of a notion of literary autonomy that was shaped by his symbolist sympathies generated a range of conceptual paradoxes that can inform current attempts to revise our understanding of how the concept has functioned historically.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-66
JournalAustralasian Journal of Victorian Studies
Volume19
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Absolute Music and Ideal Content: Autonomy, Sensation and Experience in Arthur Symons’ “Theory of Musical Aesthetics"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this