Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A TERMINAL TUSSLE: ASSISTED DYING ON THE PRECIPICE OF LEGALISATION FOR ENGLAND AND WALES BUT WILL THIS BRING SAFEGUARDING OVERREACH?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The issue of assisted dying in the United Kingdom (‘UK’) has been a consistent feature of legal and political discourse for several decades. A series of court decisions in which it was decided that neither UK common law nor the Human Rights Act 1998 (UK) supported a change to the ban on assisted suicide in the criminal law stymied the introduction of voluntary assisted dying laws. While 2009 saw the UK Director of Public Prosecutions introduce a set of guidelines designed to inform the prosecution of assisted suicide, the argument for legal change to the substantive law has persisted. This has taken the form of private members’ bills which have to date failed or lapsed at various stages of parliamentary consideration. In 2025, however, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill 2024 has passed both stages of the Commons and is on the precipice of being debated in the House of Lords. This short commentary assesses the key provisions of this proposed legislation, comparing it to the Western Australian Voluntary Assisted Dying legislation. It identi4ies key provisions in both pieces of legislation and questions whether the safeguards underlying the Bill1 will ultimately provide an obstacle for those seeking access to the statutory scheme.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-260
Number of pages20
JournalUniversity of Western Australia Law Review
Volume53
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A TERMINAL TUSSLE: ASSISTED DYING ON THE PRECIPICE OF LEGALISATION FOR ENGLAND AND WALES BUT WILL THIS BRING SAFEGUARDING OVERREACH?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this