A Severe Lack of Evidence Limits Effective Conservation of the World's Primates

Jessica Junker, Silviu O. Petrovan, Victor Arroyo-Rodríguez, Ramesh Boonratana, Dirck Byler, Colin A. Chapman, Dilip Chetry, Susan M. Cheyne, Fanny M. Cornejo, Liliana Cortés-Ortiz, Guy Cowlishaw, Alec P. Christie, Catherine Crockford, Stella De La Torre, Fabiano R. De Melo, P. Fan, Cyril C. Grueter, Diana C. Guzmán-Caro, Eckhard W. Heymann, Ilka HerbingerMinh D. Hoang, Robert H. Horwich, Tatyana Humle, Rachel A. Ikemeh, Inaoyom S. Imong, Leandro Jerusalinsky, Steig E. Johnson, Peter M. Kappeler, Maria Cecília M. Kierulff, Inza Koné, Rebecca Kormos, Khac Q. Le, Baoguo Li, Andrew J. Marshall, Erik Meijaard, Russel A. Mittermeier, Yasuyuki Muroyama, Eleonora Neugebauer, Lisa Orth, Erwin Palacios, Sarah K. Papworth, Andrew J. Plumptre, Ben M. Rawson, Johannes Refisch, Jonah Ratsimbazafy, Christian Roos, Joanna M. Setchell, Rebecca K. Smith, Tene Sop, Christoph Schwitzer, Kerry Slater, Shirley C. Strum, William J. Sutherland, MaurÍcio Talebi, Janette Wallis, Serge Wich, Elizabeth A. Williamson, Roman M. Wittig, Hjalmar S. Kühl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Threats to biodiversity are well documented. However, to effectively conserve species and their habitats, we need to know which conservation interventions do (or do not) work. Evidence-based conservation evaluates interventions within a scientific framework. The Conservation Evidence project has summarized thousands of studies testing conservation interventions and compiled these as synopses for various habitats and taxa. In the present article, we analyzed the interventions assessed in the primate synopsis and compared these with other taxa. We found that despite intensive efforts to study primates and the extensive threats they face, less than 1% of primate studies evaluated conservation effectiveness. The studies often lacked quantitative data, failed to undertake postimplementation monitoring of populations or individuals, or implemented several interventions at once. Furthermore, the studies were biased toward specific taxa, geographic regions, and interventions. We describe barriers for testing primate conservation interventions and propose actions to improve the conservation evidence base to protect this endangered and globally important taxon.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)794-803
Number of pages10
JournalBioscience
Volume70
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Sep 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Severe Lack of Evidence Limits Effective Conservation of the World's Primates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this