A re-evaluation of the conceptual model of caving mechanics

Daniel Cumming-Potvin, Johan Wesseloo, S.W. Jacobsz, E. Kearsley

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperConference paper

Abstract

The Duplancic conceptual model is the industry accepted model of caving and is the framework within which most results from numerical modelling and cave monitoring are interpreted. The Duplancic conceptual model implies that the damage ahead of the cave back decreases continuously with increasing distance from the cave surface. Evidence from a variety of sources indicates that this may not always be the case and that a discontinuous damage profile may be present. Cumming-Potvin et al. (2016b) describes a physical modelling program which was undertaken to investigate the fracturing and propagation of the cave. The results of these centrifuge tests showed that caving could occur via a series of fractures oriented parallel to the cave surface and that the cave back progressed vertically via ‘jumps’ to the next successive parallel fracture. In Cumming-Potvin et al. (2016a), this caving mechanism was termed ‘fracture banding’. Multiple examples of a similar mechanism of failure were observed in literature. In addition, the patterns in microseismic event location indicate that fracture banding could be occurring in currently operating caving mines. This paper examines evidence from a number of sources in the field of caving mechanics and presents an extended conceptual model of caving. The new model is able to account for the mechanism of fracture banding, along with the continuous style of failure from the Duplancic conceptual model. There are still many unknowns about the fracture banding mechanism and propagation of caves. These include the specific conditions under which the caving mechanism changes and whether the mechanisms lie on a continuum, or if there is a sharp, sudden change. Two conceptual models are presented: one which includes only that which is known about the mechanisms of cave propagation and one which speculates upon the factors involved and the underlying origins of the fractures. Keywords: fracture banding, cave mining, physical modelling, cave monitoring, seismicity, centrifuge
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCaving 2018
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving
EditorsYves Potvin, Jarek Jakubec
Place of PublicationPerth
PublisherAustralian Centre for Geomechanics
Pages179-190
ISBN (Print)9780992481094
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Event4th International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving: 4th International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving - Vancouver, Canada
Duration: 15 Oct 201817 Oct 2018
https://www.caving2018.com/

Conference

Conference4th International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving
Abbreviated titleCaving2018
CountryCanada
CityVancouver
Period15/10/1817/10/18
Internet address

Fingerprint

caving
mechanics
cave
centrifuge
evaluation
modeling
damage
monitoring
seismicity

Cite this

Cumming-Potvin, D., Wesseloo, J., Jacobsz, S. W., & Kearsley, E. (2018). A re-evaluation of the conceptual model of caving mechanics. In Y. Potvin, & J. Jakubec (Eds.), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving (pp. 179-190). Perth: Australian Centre for Geomechanics.
Cumming-Potvin, Daniel ; Wesseloo, Johan ; Jacobsz, S.W. ; Kearsley, E. / A re-evaluation of the conceptual model of caving mechanics. Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving. editor / Yves Potvin ; Jarek Jakubec. Perth : Australian Centre for Geomechanics, 2018. pp. 179-190
@inproceedings{8c5169f2c2484a5d9520621f113fbd06,
title = "A re-evaluation of the conceptual model of caving mechanics",
abstract = "The Duplancic conceptual model is the industry accepted model of caving and is the framework within which most results from numerical modelling and cave monitoring are interpreted. The Duplancic conceptual model implies that the damage ahead of the cave back decreases continuously with increasing distance from the cave surface. Evidence from a variety of sources indicates that this may not always be the case and that a discontinuous damage profile may be present. Cumming-Potvin et al. (2016b) describes a physical modelling program which was undertaken to investigate the fracturing and propagation of the cave. The results of these centrifuge tests showed that caving could occur via a series of fractures oriented parallel to the cave surface and that the cave back progressed vertically via ‘jumps’ to the next successive parallel fracture. In Cumming-Potvin et al. (2016a), this caving mechanism was termed ‘fracture banding’. Multiple examples of a similar mechanism of failure were observed in literature. In addition, the patterns in microseismic event location indicate that fracture banding could be occurring in currently operating caving mines. This paper examines evidence from a number of sources in the field of caving mechanics and presents an extended conceptual model of caving. The new model is able to account for the mechanism of fracture banding, along with the continuous style of failure from the Duplancic conceptual model. There are still many unknowns about the fracture banding mechanism and propagation of caves. These include the specific conditions under which the caving mechanism changes and whether the mechanisms lie on a continuum, or if there is a sharp, sudden change. Two conceptual models are presented: one which includes only that which is known about the mechanisms of cave propagation and one which speculates upon the factors involved and the underlying origins of the fractures. Keywords: fracture banding, cave mining, physical modelling, cave monitoring, seismicity, centrifuge",
author = "Daniel Cumming-Potvin and Johan Wesseloo and S.W. Jacobsz and E. Kearsley",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780992481094",
pages = "179--190",
editor = "Yves Potvin and Jarek Jakubec",
booktitle = "Caving 2018",
publisher = "Australian Centre for Geomechanics",

}

Cumming-Potvin, D, Wesseloo, J, Jacobsz, SW & Kearsley, E 2018, A re-evaluation of the conceptual model of caving mechanics. in Y Potvin & J Jakubec (eds), Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp. 179-190, 4th International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving, Vancouver, Canada, 15/10/18.

A re-evaluation of the conceptual model of caving mechanics. / Cumming-Potvin, Daniel; Wesseloo, Johan; Jacobsz, S.W.; Kearsley, E.

Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving. ed. / Yves Potvin; Jarek Jakubec. Perth : Australian Centre for Geomechanics, 2018. p. 179-190.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference paperConference paper

TY - GEN

T1 - A re-evaluation of the conceptual model of caving mechanics

AU - Cumming-Potvin, Daniel

AU - Wesseloo, Johan

AU - Jacobsz, S.W.

AU - Kearsley, E.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The Duplancic conceptual model is the industry accepted model of caving and is the framework within which most results from numerical modelling and cave monitoring are interpreted. The Duplancic conceptual model implies that the damage ahead of the cave back decreases continuously with increasing distance from the cave surface. Evidence from a variety of sources indicates that this may not always be the case and that a discontinuous damage profile may be present. Cumming-Potvin et al. (2016b) describes a physical modelling program which was undertaken to investigate the fracturing and propagation of the cave. The results of these centrifuge tests showed that caving could occur via a series of fractures oriented parallel to the cave surface and that the cave back progressed vertically via ‘jumps’ to the next successive parallel fracture. In Cumming-Potvin et al. (2016a), this caving mechanism was termed ‘fracture banding’. Multiple examples of a similar mechanism of failure were observed in literature. In addition, the patterns in microseismic event location indicate that fracture banding could be occurring in currently operating caving mines. This paper examines evidence from a number of sources in the field of caving mechanics and presents an extended conceptual model of caving. The new model is able to account for the mechanism of fracture banding, along with the continuous style of failure from the Duplancic conceptual model. There are still many unknowns about the fracture banding mechanism and propagation of caves. These include the specific conditions under which the caving mechanism changes and whether the mechanisms lie on a continuum, or if there is a sharp, sudden change. Two conceptual models are presented: one which includes only that which is known about the mechanisms of cave propagation and one which speculates upon the factors involved and the underlying origins of the fractures. Keywords: fracture banding, cave mining, physical modelling, cave monitoring, seismicity, centrifuge

AB - The Duplancic conceptual model is the industry accepted model of caving and is the framework within which most results from numerical modelling and cave monitoring are interpreted. The Duplancic conceptual model implies that the damage ahead of the cave back decreases continuously with increasing distance from the cave surface. Evidence from a variety of sources indicates that this may not always be the case and that a discontinuous damage profile may be present. Cumming-Potvin et al. (2016b) describes a physical modelling program which was undertaken to investigate the fracturing and propagation of the cave. The results of these centrifuge tests showed that caving could occur via a series of fractures oriented parallel to the cave surface and that the cave back progressed vertically via ‘jumps’ to the next successive parallel fracture. In Cumming-Potvin et al. (2016a), this caving mechanism was termed ‘fracture banding’. Multiple examples of a similar mechanism of failure were observed in literature. In addition, the patterns in microseismic event location indicate that fracture banding could be occurring in currently operating caving mines. This paper examines evidence from a number of sources in the field of caving mechanics and presents an extended conceptual model of caving. The new model is able to account for the mechanism of fracture banding, along with the continuous style of failure from the Duplancic conceptual model. There are still many unknowns about the fracture banding mechanism and propagation of caves. These include the specific conditions under which the caving mechanism changes and whether the mechanisms lie on a continuum, or if there is a sharp, sudden change. Two conceptual models are presented: one which includes only that which is known about the mechanisms of cave propagation and one which speculates upon the factors involved and the underlying origins of the fractures. Keywords: fracture banding, cave mining, physical modelling, cave monitoring, seismicity, centrifuge

UR - https://acg.uwa.edu.au/shop/caving2018/

M3 - Conference paper

SN - 9780992481094

SP - 179

EP - 190

BT - Caving 2018

A2 - Potvin, Yves

A2 - Jakubec, Jarek

PB - Australian Centre for Geomechanics

CY - Perth

ER -

Cumming-Potvin D, Wesseloo J, Jacobsz SW, Kearsley E. A re-evaluation of the conceptual model of caving mechanics. In Potvin Y, Jakubec J, editors, Caving 2018: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Block and Sublevel Caving. Perth: Australian Centre for Geomechanics. 2018. p. 179-190