A randomized clinical trial comparing oral alendronate and intravenous pamidronate for the treatment of Paget's disease of bone

John Walsh, L.C. Ward, Graeme Stewart, R.K. Will, R.A. Criddle, Richard Prince, Bronwyn Stuckey, S.S. Dhaliwal, C.I. Bhagat, R.W. Retallack, G.N. Kent, P.J. Drury, Samuel Vasikaran, D.H. Gutteridge

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    80 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Second and third generation bisphosphonates are the treatment of choice for Paget's disease of bone. These drugs are more effective than calcitonin and etidronate. but there have been no head to head, randomized controlled trials comparing potent bisphosphonates. We conducted a 2-year. randomized, open-label trial comparing oral alendronate and intravenous pamidronate in 72 subjects with Paget's disease. Randomization was stratified according to baseline plasma total alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and previous bisphosphonate treatment (yes or no). All previously treated patients had received pamidronate but not alendronate. Assigned treatments were pamidronate (60 mg) every 3 months as a single infusion or alendronate (40 mg) daily in 3-month blocks, continued until biochemical remission (defined as both ALP and urine deoxypyridinoline (DPD)/creatinine ratio in the reference range) or a clear plateau effect Was observed. At 1 year, nonresponders to pamidronate were crossed over to alendronate treatment. At 1 year, 31/36 (86%) subjects randomized to alendronate achieved biochemical remission compared with 21/36 (56%) for pamidronate (P = 0.017). There was a significantly greater reduction in ALP (P < 0.001) and DPD/creatinine ratio (P < 0.001) for alendronate compared with pamidronate treatment. In previously untreated patients, alendronate resulted in remission in 20/22 (91%) subjects compared with 19/22 (86%) of pamidronate-treated Subjects, which was not significantly different; however, alendronate resulted in a significantly greater reduction in ALP (P = 0.014) and DPD/creatinine ratio (P < 0.001). In previously treated patients, alendronate resulted in remission in 11/14 (79%) subjects compared Willi 2/14 (14%) for pamidronate (P < 0.001), with a significantly (P < 0.001) greater reduction in both ALP and DPD/creatinine ratio. Of subjects crossed over from pamidronate to alendronate, 10/14 (71%) achieved remission, including 9/11 (82%) previously treated patients. We conclude that, in patients with previously untreated Paget's disease of bone, alendronate and pamidronate have similar efficacy in achieving biochemical remission. In patients previously treated with pamidronate, alendronate is more effective. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)747-754
    JournalBone
    Volume34
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized clinical trial comparing oral alendronate and intravenous pamidronate for the treatment of Paget's disease of bone'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this