A qualitative evaluation of a Young Parents Program (YPP) – Parent and facilitator perspectives

Cecily Strange, Elaine Bennett, Maggie Tait, Yvonne Hauck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Issue addressed: Young parents (<25 years) have lower engagement with health and community services and are more likely to experience negative outcomes in the perinatal period compared to older parents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short to medium-term outcomes of the Young Parents Program (YPP), specifically designed to engage and support young parents, using responsive and codesign strategies in a community setting. Methods: A qualitative case study used data from interviews with participating parents (n = 20) and a focus group with YPP facilitators (n = 5). Results: The findings report on the following short to medium-term YPP outcomes for parents and children. Young parents: are engaged in early parenting services that are welcoming, nonjudgemental and holistic; build parenting skills, knowledge, confidence and are tuned into their infants’ needs; are empowered to codesign program activities to meet their parenting and nonparenting needs; have developed friendships and a social support network in their local community; and, are linked into community services and resources. Their children are cared for and stimulated with age-appropriate interactions and play. Conclusion: Flexible, responsive and codesigned programs for young parents are effective means of connecting parents to services, social support networks and can provide learning opportunities, which enhance both child and parent attachment and development. So what?: Qualitative evaluation provides an understanding of contextual factors – required to inform effective design and delivery of young parent community programs.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalHealth Promotion Journal of Australia
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Parents
Social Support
Parenting
Social Welfare
Focus Groups
Health Services
Learning
Interviews

Cite this

@article{4fba9e9f1c9d4b03a6918c1e25b57514,
title = "A qualitative evaluation of a Young Parents Program (YPP) – Parent and facilitator perspectives",
abstract = "Issue addressed: Young parents (<25 years) have lower engagement with health and community services and are more likely to experience negative outcomes in the perinatal period compared to older parents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short to medium-term outcomes of the Young Parents Program (YPP), specifically designed to engage and support young parents, using responsive and codesign strategies in a community setting. Methods: A qualitative case study used data from interviews with participating parents (n = 20) and a focus group with YPP facilitators (n = 5). Results: The findings report on the following short to medium-term YPP outcomes for parents and children. Young parents: are engaged in early parenting services that are welcoming, nonjudgemental and holistic; build parenting skills, knowledge, confidence and are tuned into their infants’ needs; are empowered to codesign program activities to meet their parenting and nonparenting needs; have developed friendships and a social support network in their local community; and, are linked into community services and resources. Their children are cared for and stimulated with age-appropriate interactions and play. Conclusion: Flexible, responsive and codesigned programs for young parents are effective means of connecting parents to services, social support networks and can provide learning opportunities, which enhance both child and parent attachment and development. So what?: Qualitative evaluation provides an understanding of contextual factors – required to inform effective design and delivery of young parent community programs.",
keywords = "adolescents, children, community based intervention, maternal health, program evaluation",
author = "Cecily Strange and Elaine Bennett and Maggie Tait and Yvonne Hauck",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1002/hpja.228",
language = "English",
journal = "The Health Promotion Journal of Australia",
issn = "1036-1073",
publisher = "CSIRO Publishing",

}

A qualitative evaluation of a Young Parents Program (YPP) – Parent and facilitator perspectives. / Strange, Cecily; Bennett, Elaine; Tait, Maggie; Hauck, Yvonne.

In: Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 29.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A qualitative evaluation of a Young Parents Program (YPP) – Parent and facilitator perspectives

AU - Strange, Cecily

AU - Bennett, Elaine

AU - Tait, Maggie

AU - Hauck, Yvonne

PY - 2019/12/29

Y1 - 2019/12/29

N2 - Issue addressed: Young parents (<25 years) have lower engagement with health and community services and are more likely to experience negative outcomes in the perinatal period compared to older parents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short to medium-term outcomes of the Young Parents Program (YPP), specifically designed to engage and support young parents, using responsive and codesign strategies in a community setting. Methods: A qualitative case study used data from interviews with participating parents (n = 20) and a focus group with YPP facilitators (n = 5). Results: The findings report on the following short to medium-term YPP outcomes for parents and children. Young parents: are engaged in early parenting services that are welcoming, nonjudgemental and holistic; build parenting skills, knowledge, confidence and are tuned into their infants’ needs; are empowered to codesign program activities to meet their parenting and nonparenting needs; have developed friendships and a social support network in their local community; and, are linked into community services and resources. Their children are cared for and stimulated with age-appropriate interactions and play. Conclusion: Flexible, responsive and codesigned programs for young parents are effective means of connecting parents to services, social support networks and can provide learning opportunities, which enhance both child and parent attachment and development. So what?: Qualitative evaluation provides an understanding of contextual factors – required to inform effective design and delivery of young parent community programs.

AB - Issue addressed: Young parents (<25 years) have lower engagement with health and community services and are more likely to experience negative outcomes in the perinatal period compared to older parents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short to medium-term outcomes of the Young Parents Program (YPP), specifically designed to engage and support young parents, using responsive and codesign strategies in a community setting. Methods: A qualitative case study used data from interviews with participating parents (n = 20) and a focus group with YPP facilitators (n = 5). Results: The findings report on the following short to medium-term YPP outcomes for parents and children. Young parents: are engaged in early parenting services that are welcoming, nonjudgemental and holistic; build parenting skills, knowledge, confidence and are tuned into their infants’ needs; are empowered to codesign program activities to meet their parenting and nonparenting needs; have developed friendships and a social support network in their local community; and, are linked into community services and resources. Their children are cared for and stimulated with age-appropriate interactions and play. Conclusion: Flexible, responsive and codesigned programs for young parents are effective means of connecting parents to services, social support networks and can provide learning opportunities, which enhance both child and parent attachment and development. So what?: Qualitative evaluation provides an understanding of contextual factors – required to inform effective design and delivery of young parent community programs.

KW - adolescents

KW - children

KW - community based intervention

KW - maternal health

KW - program evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060957597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hpja.228

DO - 10.1002/hpja.228

M3 - Article

JO - The Health Promotion Journal of Australia

JF - The Health Promotion Journal of Australia

SN - 1036-1073

ER -