TY - JOUR
T1 - A new urban planning code's impact on walking: The residential environments project
AU - Christian, Hayley
AU - Knuiman, Matthew
AU - Bull, Fiona
AU - Timperio, A.F.
AU - Foster, Sarah
AU - Divitini, Mark
AU - Middleton, Nicholas
AU - Giles-Corti, Billie
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Objectives. We examined whether people moving into a housing development designed according to a state government livable neighborhoods subdivision code engage in more walking than do people who move to other types of developments. Methods. In a natural experiment of 1813 people building homes in 73 new housing developments in Perth, Western Australia, we surveyed participants before and then 12 and 36 months after moving. We measured self-reported walking using the Neighborhood Physical Activity Questionnaire and collected perceptions of the environment and self-selection factors. We calculated objective measures of the built environment using a Geographic Information System. Results. After relocation, participants in livable versus conventional developments had greater street connectivity, residential density, land use mix, and access to destinations and more positive perceptions of their neighborhood (all P <.05). However, there were no significant differences in walking over time by type of development (P > .05). Conclusions. Implementation of the Livable Neighborhoods Guidelines produced more supportive environments; however, the level of intervention was insufficient to encourage more walking. Evaluations of new urban planning policies need to incorporate longer term follow-up to allow time for new neighborhoods to develop. Copyright © 2012 by the American Public Health Association®.
AB - Objectives. We examined whether people moving into a housing development designed according to a state government livable neighborhoods subdivision code engage in more walking than do people who move to other types of developments. Methods. In a natural experiment of 1813 people building homes in 73 new housing developments in Perth, Western Australia, we surveyed participants before and then 12 and 36 months after moving. We measured self-reported walking using the Neighborhood Physical Activity Questionnaire and collected perceptions of the environment and self-selection factors. We calculated objective measures of the built environment using a Geographic Information System. Results. After relocation, participants in livable versus conventional developments had greater street connectivity, residential density, land use mix, and access to destinations and more positive perceptions of their neighborhood (all P <.05). However, there were no significant differences in walking over time by type of development (P > .05). Conclusions. Implementation of the Livable Neighborhoods Guidelines produced more supportive environments; however, the level of intervention was insufficient to encourage more walking. Evaluations of new urban planning policies need to incorporate longer term follow-up to allow time for new neighborhoods to develop. Copyright © 2012 by the American Public Health Association®.
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301230
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301230
M3 - Article
C2 - 23678917
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 103
SP - 1219
EP - 1228
JO - American Journal of Public Health
JF - American Journal of Public Health
IS - 7
ER -