A legibility scale for early primary handwriting: Authentic task and cognitive load influences

Cornelia Staats, Grace Oakley, Ida Marais

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study set out to examine the range of legibility demonstrated by Western Australian students required to handwrite tasks of increasing intrinsic cognitive load. A representative sample of students in Years 1, 2 and 3 (N=437) was recruited for a cross sectional study and teachers administered handwriting tasks. Year 1 students were administered easier tasks (copying from the board and dictation), and Year 3 students were administered more difficult tasks (dictation and composition), whilst students in Year 2 were administered all three tasks. A rubric was then constructed for six aspects of legibility from selected participant exemplars: letter formation, size, space in word, space between words, line placement, and slant, providing 18 items for analysis (3 tasks x 6 aspects). The rubric demonstrated acceptable inter- and intra-reliability. Scores were assigned following pairwise comparisons; a Rasch model (RM) analysis was applied to scores. Fit to the RM was confirmed to permit a more accurate assessment of legibility. The study substantiates many assumptions about handwriting in the extant literature, and more specifically reveals how cognitive load governs legibility when students are learning to handwrite. Implications for practice are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)537-561
Number of pages25
JournalIssues in Educational Research
Volume29
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 14 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

handwriting
student
model analysis
cross-sectional study
teacher
learning

Cite this

@article{00270413b839417fa54aef33a875e54e,
title = "A legibility scale for early primary handwriting: Authentic task and cognitive load influences",
abstract = "This study set out to examine the range of legibility demonstrated by Western Australian students required to handwrite tasks of increasing intrinsic cognitive load. A representative sample of students in Years 1, 2 and 3 (N=437) was recruited for a cross sectional study and teachers administered handwriting tasks. Year 1 students were administered easier tasks (copying from the board and dictation), and Year 3 students were administered more difficult tasks (dictation and composition), whilst students in Year 2 were administered all three tasks. A rubric was then constructed for six aspects of legibility from selected participant exemplars: letter formation, size, space in word, space between words, line placement, and slant, providing 18 items for analysis (3 tasks x 6 aspects). The rubric demonstrated acceptable inter- and intra-reliability. Scores were assigned following pairwise comparisons; a Rasch model (RM) analysis was applied to scores. Fit to the RM was confirmed to permit a more accurate assessment of legibility. The study substantiates many assumptions about handwriting in the extant literature, and more specifically reveals how cognitive load governs legibility when students are learning to handwrite. Implications for practice are discussed.",
author = "Cornelia Staats and Grace Oakley and Ida Marais",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "14",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "537--561",
journal = "Issues in Educational Research",
issn = "1837-6290",
publisher = "WESTERN AUSTRALIAN INST EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INC",
number = "2",

}

A legibility scale for early primary handwriting : Authentic task and cognitive load influences. / Staats, Cornelia; Oakley, Grace; Marais, Ida.

In: Issues in Educational Research, Vol. 29, No. 2, 14.04.2019, p. 537-561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A legibility scale for early primary handwriting

T2 - Authentic task and cognitive load influences

AU - Staats, Cornelia

AU - Oakley, Grace

AU - Marais, Ida

PY - 2019/4/14

Y1 - 2019/4/14

N2 - This study set out to examine the range of legibility demonstrated by Western Australian students required to handwrite tasks of increasing intrinsic cognitive load. A representative sample of students in Years 1, 2 and 3 (N=437) was recruited for a cross sectional study and teachers administered handwriting tasks. Year 1 students were administered easier tasks (copying from the board and dictation), and Year 3 students were administered more difficult tasks (dictation and composition), whilst students in Year 2 were administered all three tasks. A rubric was then constructed for six aspects of legibility from selected participant exemplars: letter formation, size, space in word, space between words, line placement, and slant, providing 18 items for analysis (3 tasks x 6 aspects). The rubric demonstrated acceptable inter- and intra-reliability. Scores were assigned following pairwise comparisons; a Rasch model (RM) analysis was applied to scores. Fit to the RM was confirmed to permit a more accurate assessment of legibility. The study substantiates many assumptions about handwriting in the extant literature, and more specifically reveals how cognitive load governs legibility when students are learning to handwrite. Implications for practice are discussed.

AB - This study set out to examine the range of legibility demonstrated by Western Australian students required to handwrite tasks of increasing intrinsic cognitive load. A representative sample of students in Years 1, 2 and 3 (N=437) was recruited for a cross sectional study and teachers administered handwriting tasks. Year 1 students were administered easier tasks (copying from the board and dictation), and Year 3 students were administered more difficult tasks (dictation and composition), whilst students in Year 2 were administered all three tasks. A rubric was then constructed for six aspects of legibility from selected participant exemplars: letter formation, size, space in word, space between words, line placement, and slant, providing 18 items for analysis (3 tasks x 6 aspects). The rubric demonstrated acceptable inter- and intra-reliability. Scores were assigned following pairwise comparisons; a Rasch model (RM) analysis was applied to scores. Fit to the RM was confirmed to permit a more accurate assessment of legibility. The study substantiates many assumptions about handwriting in the extant literature, and more specifically reveals how cognitive load governs legibility when students are learning to handwrite. Implications for practice are discussed.

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 537

EP - 561

JO - Issues in Educational Research

JF - Issues in Educational Research

SN - 1837-6290

IS - 2

ER -