A Comparison of Three Payment Systems For Public Paediatric Dental Services

Jennifer Hanthorn Conquest, John Skinner, Estie Kruger, Marc Tennant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Objective This study investigated the delivery of paediatric (0-17 years) government dental services in New South Wales (NSW), Australia through public dental clinics and the commissioned payments models of Fee-forService and Capped-Fee.

Method De-identified patient data from government provided dental care and the commissioned services was sourced from NSW Oral Health Data Warehouse for evaluation and interpretation using descriptive analysis during the period 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2013.

Result The breakdown of dental care provided the associated cost analysis for the study's cohort that resulted in both years, more than 50 percent dental services offered to paediatric patients were preventive care in all payment systems. The most common preventive items offered were fluoride treatment, dietary advice, oral health education and fissure sealants.

Conclusion There was little difference in the mix of dental care provided between study years and age groups through the three payment systems in NSW. The difference between the government services and those provided via the Fee-for-Service and Capitation payment systems was negligible.

This has important implications for the delivery of dental care to public dental care, particularly when patients may not live close to a public dental clinic and also with the interest nationally in giving patients greater choice.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages7
JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Health Management
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2018


Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of Three Payment Systems For Public Paediatric Dental Services'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this