A comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis-guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions

Carolyn Madeley, Meredith Kessell, Chris Madeley, Donna Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Impalpable breast cancers require precise pre-operative lesion localisation to minimise re-excision rates. Conventional techniques include hookwire insertion using stereotactic guidance. Newer techniques include the use of tomosynthesis guidance and the use of iodine-125 seeds. This study compares the accuracy of lesion localisation with hookwire or seed insertion using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance. Methods: This registered quality improvement activity did not require formal ethics approval. The post-localisation images for 116 lesions were reviewed. The distance from the lesion or breast biopsy marker to the hookwire or seed was measured on post-insertion mammograms. The relative placement accuracy of hookwire or seed using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance was compared. A lesion to seed or wire distance > 10 mm was considered technically unsatisfactory. Results: 94.8% of the seeds and wires inserted via prone stereotactic guidance were accurately placed, compared with 89.6% of those inserted via upright tomosynthesis. There were twice as many technically unsatisfactory insertions under upright tomosynthesis guidance. The majority of the unsatisfactory insertions using upright tomosynthesis occurred when the lesion was at or below the level of the nipple and the insertion was performed craniocaudally. Conclusion: The degree of accuracy of pre-operative localisation of impalpable breast lesions is significantly higher with the use of prone stereotactic rather than upright tomosynthesis guidance. This was most evident with the placement of I-125 seeds, and in cases where the target lesion was located below the level of the nipple.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Medical Radiation Sciences
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Seeds
Breast
Nipples
Quality Improvement
Ethics
Iodine
Breast Neoplasms
Biopsy

Cite this

@article{a4ec603dab0d42c3937f2007214eb913,
title = "A comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis-guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions",
abstract = "Introduction: Impalpable breast cancers require precise pre-operative lesion localisation to minimise re-excision rates. Conventional techniques include hookwire insertion using stereotactic guidance. Newer techniques include the use of tomosynthesis guidance and the use of iodine-125 seeds. This study compares the accuracy of lesion localisation with hookwire or seed insertion using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance. Methods: This registered quality improvement activity did not require formal ethics approval. The post-localisation images for 116 lesions were reviewed. The distance from the lesion or breast biopsy marker to the hookwire or seed was measured on post-insertion mammograms. The relative placement accuracy of hookwire or seed using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance was compared. A lesion to seed or wire distance > 10 mm was considered technically unsatisfactory. Results: 94.8{\%} of the seeds and wires inserted via prone stereotactic guidance were accurately placed, compared with 89.6{\%} of those inserted via upright tomosynthesis. There were twice as many technically unsatisfactory insertions under upright tomosynthesis guidance. The majority of the unsatisfactory insertions using upright tomosynthesis occurred when the lesion was at or below the level of the nipple and the insertion was performed craniocaudally. Conclusion: The degree of accuracy of pre-operative localisation of impalpable breast lesions is significantly higher with the use of prone stereotactic rather than upright tomosynthesis guidance. This was most evident with the placement of I-125 seeds, and in cases where the target lesion was located below the level of the nipple.",
keywords = "accuracy, breast, lesion localisation, stereotactic, tomosynthesis",
author = "Carolyn Madeley and Meredith Kessell and Chris Madeley and Donna Taylor",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1002/jmrs.348",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences",
issn = "1170-9758",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",

}

A comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis-guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions. / Madeley, Carolyn; Kessell, Meredith; Madeley, Chris; Taylor, Donna.

In: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 25.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of stereotactic and tomosynthesis-guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions

AU - Madeley, Carolyn

AU - Kessell, Meredith

AU - Madeley, Chris

AU - Taylor, Donna

PY - 2019/7/25

Y1 - 2019/7/25

N2 - Introduction: Impalpable breast cancers require precise pre-operative lesion localisation to minimise re-excision rates. Conventional techniques include hookwire insertion using stereotactic guidance. Newer techniques include the use of tomosynthesis guidance and the use of iodine-125 seeds. This study compares the accuracy of lesion localisation with hookwire or seed insertion using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance. Methods: This registered quality improvement activity did not require formal ethics approval. The post-localisation images for 116 lesions were reviewed. The distance from the lesion or breast biopsy marker to the hookwire or seed was measured on post-insertion mammograms. The relative placement accuracy of hookwire or seed using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance was compared. A lesion to seed or wire distance > 10 mm was considered technically unsatisfactory. Results: 94.8% of the seeds and wires inserted via prone stereotactic guidance were accurately placed, compared with 89.6% of those inserted via upright tomosynthesis. There were twice as many technically unsatisfactory insertions under upright tomosynthesis guidance. The majority of the unsatisfactory insertions using upright tomosynthesis occurred when the lesion was at or below the level of the nipple and the insertion was performed craniocaudally. Conclusion: The degree of accuracy of pre-operative localisation of impalpable breast lesions is significantly higher with the use of prone stereotactic rather than upright tomosynthesis guidance. This was most evident with the placement of I-125 seeds, and in cases where the target lesion was located below the level of the nipple.

AB - Introduction: Impalpable breast cancers require precise pre-operative lesion localisation to minimise re-excision rates. Conventional techniques include hookwire insertion using stereotactic guidance. Newer techniques include the use of tomosynthesis guidance and the use of iodine-125 seeds. This study compares the accuracy of lesion localisation with hookwire or seed insertion using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance. Methods: This registered quality improvement activity did not require formal ethics approval. The post-localisation images for 116 lesions were reviewed. The distance from the lesion or breast biopsy marker to the hookwire or seed was measured on post-insertion mammograms. The relative placement accuracy of hookwire or seed using prone stereotactic or upright tomosynthesis guidance was compared. A lesion to seed or wire distance > 10 mm was considered technically unsatisfactory. Results: 94.8% of the seeds and wires inserted via prone stereotactic guidance were accurately placed, compared with 89.6% of those inserted via upright tomosynthesis. There were twice as many technically unsatisfactory insertions under upright tomosynthesis guidance. The majority of the unsatisfactory insertions using upright tomosynthesis occurred when the lesion was at or below the level of the nipple and the insertion was performed craniocaudally. Conclusion: The degree of accuracy of pre-operative localisation of impalpable breast lesions is significantly higher with the use of prone stereotactic rather than upright tomosynthesis guidance. This was most evident with the placement of I-125 seeds, and in cases where the target lesion was located below the level of the nipple.

KW - accuracy

KW - breast

KW - lesion localisation

KW - stereotactic

KW - tomosynthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070262305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jmrs.348

DO - 10.1002/jmrs.348

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences

JF - Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences

SN - 1170-9758

ER -