A comparison of haemolytic responses in fore-foot and rear-foot distance runners

Stuart Caulfield, Kirsty Mcdonald, Brian Dawson, Sarah M. Stearne, Ben A. Green, Jonas Rubenson, Tristan D. Clemons, Peter Peeling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Web of Science)
335 Downloads (Pure)


This study examined the haemolytic effects of an interval-based running task in fore-foot and rear-foot striking runners. Nineteen male distance runners (10 fore-foot, 9 rear-foot) completed 8 × 3 min repeats at 90% vVO2peak on a motorised treadmill. Pre- and post-exercise venous blood samples were analysed for serum haptoglobin to quantify the haemolytic response to running. Vertical ground reaction forces were also captured via a force plate beneath the treadmill belt. Haptoglobin levels were significantly decreased following exercise (P = 0.001) in both groups (but not between groups), suggesting that the running task created a haemolytic stress. The ground reaction force data showed strong effect sizes for a greater peak force (d = 1.20) and impulse (d = 1.37) in fore-foot runners, and a greater rate of force development (d = 2.74) in rear-foot runners. The lack of difference in haptoglobin response between groups may be explained by the trend for fore-foot runners to experience greater peak force and impulse during the stance phase of their running gait, potentially negating any impact of the greater rate of force development occurring from the rear-foot runners’ heel strike. Neither type of runner (fore-foot or rear-foot) appears more susceptible to technique-related foot-strike haemolysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1485-1490
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Issue number15
Early online date30 Nov 2015
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of haemolytic responses in fore-foot and rear-foot distance runners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this