64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

G Mowatt, J A Cook, G S Hillis, S Walker, C Fraser, X Jia, N Waugh

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

380 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

CONTEXT: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of mortality and ill health.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether 64-slice CT angiography might replace some coronary angiography (CA) for diagnosis and assessment of CAD.

DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases, conference proceedings and reference lists of included studies.

STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies compared 64-slice CT with a reference standard of CA in adults with suspected/known CAD, reporting sensitivity and specificity or true and false positives and negatives.

DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data from included studies.

RESULTS: Forty studies were included; 28 provided sufficient data for inclusion in the meta-analyses, all using a cut off point of >/=50% stenosis to define significant CAD. In patient-based detection (n = 1286) 64-slice CT pooled sensitivity was 99% (95% credible interval (CrI) 97% to 99%), specificity 89% (95% CrI 83% to 94%), median positive predictive value (PPV) across studies 93% (range 64-100%) and negative predictive value (NPV) 100% (range 86-100%). In segment-based detection (n = 14 199) 64-slice CT pooled sensitivity was 90% (95% CrI 85% to 94%), specificity 97% (95% CrI 95% to 98%), median PPV across studies 76% (range 44-93%) and NPV 99% (range 95-100%).

CONCLUSIONS: 64-Slice CT is highly sensitive for patient-based detection of CAD and has high NPV. An ability to rule out significant CAD means that it may have a role in the assessment of chest pain, particularly when the diagnosis remains uncertain despite clinical evaluation and simple non-invasive testing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1386-93
Number of pages8
JournalHeart
Volume94
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Cite this